McDonalds,ridiculed,the,court, law McDonalds ridiculed in the court The Famous Lawsuit
Bankruptcy is a situation, wherein an individual is termed as unable to discharge all the debts. When a person or a company is not able to pay off its creditors, it has an obligation to file a bankruptcy suit. In fact, a bankruptcy suit is a When you work with an attorney, you will have no problem reducing the risks associated with getting your case in front of a judge and jury, or other formal court, when you need to. However, every case is different. It is important to work wi
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;mso-style-noshow:yes;mso-style-parent:"";mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;mso-para-margin:0in;mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:#0400;mso-fareast-language:#0400;mso-bidi-language:#0400;}On February 27, 1992, Stella Liebeck, a79-year-old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, ordered a 49 cent cupof coffee from the drive-through of a local McDonald's. This triggered one ofthe most controversial and disputed cases in the history of law. Stella was atthe passenger seat and her grandson was driving. After he parked the car, sheplaced the cup between her knees, opened it to add cream and sugar andaccidentally spilled the entire cup on coffee on her lap. The hot liquid gaveher third-degree burns on six percent of her skin and lesser burns over sixteenpercent. She spent $11.000 and required two years of treatment. Naturally shetried to blame someone and the only candidate was the McDonalds Corporation, soa lawsuit followed. In 1994 after thetreatment was over Stella tried to settle with McDonald's for US $20.000 (whichwas actually more than she spent on the doctors). The corporation refused andit was the biggest failure of McLawyers because Stella hired an attorney andsued McDonalds for gross negligence and selling coffee that was unreasonablydangerous and defectively manufactured. The whole case would probably beturned down by the court, but the lawyers discovered an interesting detail thatbecame a cornerstone of the case. The rules of theMcDonalds franchise set the appropriate temperature of coffee at 180190 °F(8288 °C) while in most of the other restaurants serve the coffee at lowertemperatures. The McLawyers responded that the higher temperature is a must fora drive-through, where the people need additional time to park their car beforeconsuming the coffee. After lot of heated arguments for and against hot coffeethe case went to trial. A jury decided that McDonald's had 80% of the fault andLiebeck the other 20%. The jury confirmed that the cup had a hazard warning butit was not large enough and not sufficient. The huge sum that cameup in the trial had a funny history. Stellas attorney Reed Morgan suggested thatMcDonalds should be o penalized for one or two days' worth of coffee revenuesand the revenues were about $1.35 million per day. The jury accepted this offerand added another $200.000 as compensatory damages, which were later reduced to$160.000 and formed the historical 2.86 dollar coffee burn. Of course the trialjudge lowered the whole sum to $640.00. Finally both parties settled out ofcourt for an undisclosed amount less that $600.000, a big failure if we compareit to the twenty thousand as the first sum, but a big success compared to thetwo and a half million before the trial. As for theconsequences of this historical case, except for a heated discussion, the casetriggered a tort reform in the United States. Also the Stella Awards were founded,these awards are given to people who file the most outrageous and frivolouslawsuits. As always lot of the people continue to see this situation asridiculous. Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;mso-style-noshow:yes;mso-style-parent:"";mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;mso-para-margin:0in;mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:#0400;mso-fareast-language:#0400;mso-bidi-language:#0400;}For moreinformation regarding Lawsuits,defense lawyers, TorontoLawyer and Legal services please visit: www.lawyerahead.ca
McDonalds,ridiculed,the,court,