英国论坛
EU court rejects child benefits challenge
这次脱欧看来是板上钉钉了
A challenge to the UK’s right to deny some EU migrants child benefit and child tax credits has been rejected by European judges.
The European Court of Justice said it was lawful for the UK to withhold benefits to migrants if they did not have the right to reside in the UK.
Such “unequal treatment” was justified on the basis of “protecting a member state’s finances”, it ruled.
Benefit curbs were a key plank of David Cameron’s EU renegotiations.
Following a long-running legal argument, the EU Court dismissed the European Commission’s challenge to the UK’s right to restrict benefits to migrants who are “economically inactive” on the grounds that they did not have the right to live in the UK.
It concluded: “There is nothing to prevent the grant of social benefits to EU citizens who are not economically active being made subject to the requirement that those citizens fulfil the conditions for possessing a right to reside lawfully in the host member state.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36526158
回帖
拜托这明明对英国政府是利好
回帖
英文不好？ 
回帖
楼主的新闻反而证明了卡梅伦政府无能 ，自己的事还要欧盟做决断，这更坚定了民众退欧的决心{:5_142:}
回帖
回帖
Following a long-running legal argument, the EU Court dismissed the European Commission’s challenge to the UK’s right to restrict benefits to migrants who are “economically inactive” on the grounds that they did not have the right to live in the UK.
It concluded: “There is nothing to prevent the grant of social benefits to EU citizens who are not economically active being made subject to the requirement that those citizens fulfil the conditions for possessing a right to reside lawfully in the host member state.”
比较讨厌读这些类似法律式又长又臭的段落，
不zhuangbility地说，读起来真累，还感觉读不清楚的感觉
回帖
回帖
Boris Johnson连脸都不要了，别人想打他脸都打不着…
回帖
骗子卡梅伦的留欧派好有一比：狗掀门帘子，就指着嘴呢
回帖
楼主的意思大概是这样的challenge多此一举，明明自己国家说了算的事情竟然还要看人脸色
回帖
好象退欧以后想要跟欧盟谈自由贸易的时候就可以不用看脸色似的。。。。
回帖
回帖
回帖
回帖
难道退欧以后，德国奔驰宝马奥迪大众保时捷 都撤出英国市场么？
回帖
回帖
回帖
回帖
回帖