Diabetes,behavior,url,#default health Diabetes

The technology behind listening devices has improved dramatically in recent years, giving new hope to those with impairment. While still far from a perfect replacement for the natural ability to hear, these devices give those with a disabili If the vagina is not offering the firm grip to your male partner, he expresses displeasure in lovemaking. You need to tighten the orifice and regain lost elasticity. You can make use of herbal remedies for loose vagina treatment naturally. H

v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;mso-style-noshow:yes;mso-style-parent:"";mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;mso-para-margin:0in;mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:#0400;mso-fareast-language:#0400;mso-bidi-language:#0400;} Istarted doing research on diabetes when I learned of the astounding increase inthe number of Americans who are afflicted with this health problem.  Hereis how it was announced:Diabetes up sharply in 1990s, study showsAug. 24, 2000By Anita Manning, USA TODAY  The prevalence ofdiabetes in adults once thought to be primarily a disease of middle age orolder, jumped nearly 70% among people in their 30s in the last decade, a reportsays. Overall, diabetes increased 33% from 1990 to 1998, U.S. healthofficials say.  In the studypublished today in the September issue of Diabetes Care, researchers with theCenters for Disease Control and Prevention found diabetes more common acrossall ages, races and educational levels. The increase was greatest amongHispanics, for whom the rate shot up 38%, compared with 29% for whites and 26%for blacks. Ifelt, as a health researcher, that any disease as widespread as this one, andnow found to be increasing as rapidly as was diabetes, certainly need someattention from me. I havea by now settled in on a fairly standard way of doing research.  I justtravel all over the web, looking at all sorts of pages.  I particularlyconcentrate on web sites, which might represent some "official" groupconcerned with a disease, or a treatment.  I didn't know the name of the"diabetes group," but I knew there would be one.  Certainly itwas easy to find.  I found it as, TheAmerican DiabeticAssociation. (http://www.karlloren.com/Diabetes/p21.htm)  Almostalways these "official" groups are government sponsored, or perhapsnot official government agencies, but non-profit, charitable groups that oftenget millions of dollars of government money for research. Sureenough! That was the ADA-- the American Diabetic Association.  On every page of this web sectionyou'll find the ADAlogo, top right corner, top of every page.  You can click there any timeto view the dozens of pages from their official web site. I havefound, researching many different subjects that these "official"groups almost always have recommendations concerning their area of expertise --I find these recommendations and read them carefully. It is amazing to me that this is now sogenerally true. Invariably I find that there "official" groupstypically recommend treatments that are exactly the opposite of what should bepresented.  This is certainly true about the diet recommended for heartdisease (http://www.oralchelation.net/heartdisease/ChapterFive/page5.htm) by the American HeartAssociation. Ialready had read quite a bit about diabetes, and knew, generally, that adiabetic just couldn't afford to eat much sugar -- that sugar was exactly thewrong thing for his diet. So,immediately as I started reading on the ADAweb site, what did I find?  Recommendations that sugar was OK!  Hereis the official statement: CARBOHYDRATE AND SWEETENERS -- The percentage of calories fromcarbohydrate will also vary [in a properdiet for a diabetic], and isindividualized based on the patient's eating habits and glucose and lipidgoals. For most of this century, the most widely held belief about the dietarytreatment of diabetes has been that "simple" sugars should be avoidedand replaced with complex carbohydrates. This belief appears to be based on theassumption that sugars are more rapidly digested and absorbed than are starchesand thereby aggravate hyperglycemia to a greater degree.  There is, however, very little scientific evidence that supports thisassumption. Fruits and milk have been shown to have a lower glycemic responsethan most starches, and sucrose produces a glycemic response similar to that of bread,rice, and potatoes. Although various starches do have different glycemicresponses, from a clinical perspective first priority should be given to the total amount of carbohydrateconsumed rather than the source of the carbohydrate. [Source] (http://www.karlloren.com/diet/p44.htm) Itblows you away to find these recommendations. Oh! The recommendations arecouched in language that gives some need for moderation, but there is NO stresson the absolute danger of including sugar in the diet of a diabetic.  Itell you here and now that the ADArecommended diet is EXACTLY the diet that will cause a person to become adiabetic.  The ADAis like the ostrich with its head in the sand -- it certainly won't see anytruth anywhere! I hadalso read many other web sites about what treatments were found to be effective-- besides a very strict low-carbohydrate diet.  These "other"web sites, you understand, never represent the large, well-funded agencies thatare at the top of the list for each disease.  I found many references tothe value of a diabetic including chromium in his diet. So, Ilooked on the ADAweb site.  I found exactly what I would expect. Hereis the OFFICIAL position of the ADA:"Due to the technical limitations inmeasuring chromium status, it is difficult to quantify a chromiumrequirement.  Therefore, there is no current Recommended Dietary Allowancefor chromium."  Yousee how cleverly they have covered their rear ends! They acknowledge that thereis some "data" out in the world about chromium for diabetics, butthey don't recommend it (because there are "technical limitations inmeasuring chromium status!" What aterrible thing to write. What Ifound, looking at scientific studies, included: Chromium functions in maintaining normal glucose tolerance primarily byregulating insulin action. In the presence of optimal amounts of biologicallyactive chromium, much lower amounts of insulin are required. Glucoseintolerance, related to insufficient dietary chromium, appears to bewidespread. Improved chromium nutrition leads to improved sugar metabolism inhypoglycemias, hyperglycemias, and diabetics.   Someonewho has read of the great value to a diabetic of having enough chromium in hisdiet comes to his diabetic friend with this urgent news. The friend, dutifully,goes to the "official" ADA web site, searches for"chromium" and tells his friend, "Oh,yes! The American Diabetic Association is fully informed on this chromiumstuff, and is keeping up to date on it. They are watching.  They havedecided that, FOR NOW, chromium is not recommended!" Thefriend walks away, wondering if all this good news he found out about chromiumand diabetes was just junk. If theADA had NOTHINGon their web about chromium, it would be much more suspicious. But, what theydo have is just enough to let you know that they are "watching," and"not to worry because we are looking out for your best interests!" As myresearch on diabetes continued I realized that there was a much morefundamental need here -- a need to research "diet" itself.  Igathered quite a bit of information about diabetes, and you will find it here.But,mostly I started researching how diet could improve health; generally, and howthe proper diet would absolutely reverse almost all cases ofdiabetes.   ALL! I evenrealized that many diabetics would possibly read this material and neverfollow, or even try, the diet I recommend.  I had to address that issuetoo.  It is all here! Inparticular the link to the diet section (http://www.karlloren.com/Diabetes/raw-food-diet.htm) is quite the complete answer to diabetes just now. Take a look!