E-Cigarette,Ban,Absurd,Normal, ecommerce E-Cigarette Ban is Absurd
Wood handles are used in tools due to their ability to provide a good grip when holding the tool. Unlike many other types of handles; wooded handles are easy to grip do not transfer heat and are not an electrical conductor. Therefore, making I will be answering three main questions in this Emerald Passport Review for all of the tenacious Entrepreneurs that are seeking the ideal Home Based Business Opportunity. Internet Marketing has seen some tremendous growth in the "work at ho
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;mso-style-noshow:yes;mso-style-parent:"";mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;mso-para-margin:0in;mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:#0400;mso-fareast-language:#0400;mso-bidi-language:#0400;}Despite thebest efforts of anti-smoking advocates to educate, tax, and ban tobacco usersout of their habit, millions of people continue to smoke and 400,000 of themdie each year in the U.S.as a result. Such statistics may lead you to think that any safe smokingalternative would be cheered by public health advocates and you'd be wrong.Enter e-cigarettes. Theseamazing little devices mimic the look, feel and taste of traditional cheap cigarettes,and deliver the dose of nicotine a smoker craves without most of the 10,000chemicals contained within cigarettes. That means we have a way to savethousands of lives and the anti-smoking lobby is standing in the way without ashred of evidence in support. Accordingto the Boston Globe, 10 communities in Massachusettshave banned the smoking alternatives in workplaces, and a number of medicalresearchers have come out against e-cigs. Dr. Paula Johnson, a cardiologist andhead of Boston'sPublic Health Commission called e-cigs devices that deliver a toxic, addictivesubstance. Authorities in Australia,where e-cigs are illegal, have also criticized their use because they don'thelp smokers quit nicotine and allegedly pose a serious health risk. You'd thinksmart people using authoritative language would have evidence to back up theirclaims, but they don't in this case. E-cigs do indeed deliver nicotine, butwithout the cornucopia of chemicals contained in traditional cigarettes,nicotine isn't the monster it's made out to be. Yes, as Johnson claims, it istoxic. But overdose through discountWinston cigarette smoke is unlikely, according to the University of Utah's genetics department. An e-ciguser would need multiple nicotine sources to do any serious harm to theirhealth in this regard. But do theelectronic devices pose a health risk in some other way? That's also unlikely.The first clinical trial that looked at e-cigs, published in BMC Public Health,concluded that the e-Cigarette can help smokers to remain abstinent or reducetheir cigarette consumption. By replacing tobacco cigarettes, the e-cigarettecan only save lives. Here we show for the first time that e-Cigarettes cansubstantially decrease cigarette consumption without causing significant sideeffects in smokers not intending to quit. The FDA'sinitial analysis two years ago of 18 e-cig cartridges found that the devicescontain far fewer tobacco specific nitrosamines and tobacco specificimpurities and at very low levels. To give you a standard to measure thisby, the chemicals found in e-cigs are comparable to those found in approvedsmoking cessation products, like nicotine gum and patches. Unless the FDA andother critics are about to call for bans on other smoking cessation products,what we have is a textbook example of hypocrisy. But perhapsthe hollowness argument leveled at e-cigs, as voiced by experts in Australia, isprecisely what makes the devices so innovative: they're similar to the realthing. Because e-cigarettes mimics sic smoking in both design and use, the ACTHealth Directorate does not support their use.'' So, ifpublic health advocates are going to ignore the personal choice question whatand if people smoke is nobody's business but their own, after all they needgood science to justify their assault on e-cigs. The research so far revealsthe exact opposite; what we have is a product that helps smokers drop theirdeadly habit and live healthier lives. Everybody should keep that in mind asthis debate progresses. MarketingManager World Technology Network 2013 H Street, NY, 10001, USA 559-481 http://www.cigs4girls.com/
E-Cigarette,Ban,Absurd,Normal,